<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nine Ways the Internet Could Change that Would Make Search as We Know it Obsolete</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acquisio.com/blog/9-ways-the-internet-could-change-that-would-make-search-as-we-know-it-obsolete/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acquisio.com/blog/9-ways-the-internet-could-change-that-would-make-search-as-we-know-it-obsolete/</link>
	<description>Canadian Flavoured Marketing Soup</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:56:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2010: When the Searching Part of Finding Things Becomes Obsolete &#124; Acquisio Search Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.acquisio.com/blog/9-ways-the-internet-could-change-that-would-make-search-as-we-know-it-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-8477</link>
		<dc:creator>2010: When the Searching Part of Finding Things Becomes Obsolete &#124; Acquisio Search Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 13:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquisio.com/blog/?p=685#comment-8477</guid>
		<description>[...] Earlier in ’09 I wrote a post about ways the Internet might change that could alter how we think a.... The first item on the list was a look at personalized information agents – information fetching algorithms that learn about your habits and present information proactively you might want to see. Google, with its recent adaptation of personalized search as the default for Google search, is lumbering slowly down an inevitable road towards being my personal information agent. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Earlier in ’09 I wrote a post about ways the Internet might change that could alter how we think a&#8230;. The first item on the list was a look at personalized information agents – information fetching algorithms that learn about your habits and present information proactively you might want to see. Google, with its recent adaptation of personalized search as the default for Google search, is lumbering slowly down an inevitable road towards being my personal information agent. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forward and Backward; Musings on Librarianship and the Future of Search &#124; Acquisio Search Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.acquisio.com/blog/9-ways-the-internet-could-change-that-would-make-search-as-we-know-it-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-6861</link>
		<dc:creator>Forward and Backward; Musings on Librarianship and the Future of Search &#124; Acquisio Search Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquisio.com/blog/?p=685#comment-6861</guid>
		<description>[...] article is written in response to Naoise Osborne’s engaging post “Nine Ways the Internet Could Change that Would Make Search as We Know it Obsolete” (August 26, 2009). As I read it, I had an eerie feeling that for me, a librarian, the future he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] article is written in response to Naoise Osborne’s engaging post “Nine Ways the Internet Could Change that Would Make Search as We Know it Obsolete” (August 26, 2009). As I read it, I had an eerie feeling that for me, a librarian, the future he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Doctor</title>
		<link>http://www.acquisio.com/blog/9-ways-the-internet-could-change-that-would-make-search-as-we-know-it-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-6274</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Doctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 18:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquisio.com/blog/?p=685#comment-6274</guid>
		<description>Great article, its not often you find this level of writing in a blog. The sematic web is the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article, its not often you find this level of writing in a blog. The sematic web is the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Search is Essential to the Freedom of Human Civilization &#124; Acquisio Search Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.acquisio.com/blog/9-ways-the-internet-could-change-that-would-make-search-as-we-know-it-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-6235</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Search is Essential to the Freedom of Human Civilization &#124; Acquisio Search Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 14:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquisio.com/blog/?p=685#comment-6235</guid>
		<description>[...] disconcerting enough. Even if that may be a little far-fetched, it’s certainly not far-fetched to ask the question: if the country’s electricity grid fails, or if brown-outs and blackouts significantly affect our [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] disconcerting enough. Even if that may be a little far-fetched, it’s certainly not far-fetched to ask the question: if the country’s electricity grid fails, or if brown-outs and blackouts significantly affect our [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack conrack</title>
		<link>http://www.acquisio.com/blog/9-ways-the-internet-could-change-that-would-make-search-as-we-know-it-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-5762</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack conrack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 09:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquisio.com/blog/?p=685#comment-5762</guid>
		<description>Microsoft and Google will face tough competition in the next few years and will competd in information technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft and Google will face tough competition in the next few years and will competd in information technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.acquisio.com/blog/9-ways-the-internet-could-change-that-would-make-search-as-we-know-it-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-5701</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquisio.com/blog/?p=685#comment-5701</guid>
		<description>I really liked your post (especially the pictures) but I have to say that although you are right in saying that the &quot;semantic web&quot; has a long way to go to be truly &quot;semantic&quot;, the &quot;semantic web&quot; != &quot;semantics&quot;  - it&#039;s more of an abstraction.  When we refer to &quot;containers&quot; in coding, we don&#039;t actually mean that they can hold liquid in them. 

http://www.scienceforseo.com/semantic-web/semantics-web-semantics/

It&#039;s natural language understanding (and generation) that has to develop for the language issue to be resolved. For that to happen AI also have to progress. Using structured data wikipedia style and querying via SPARQL is fine, it&#039;s what Sem Web is about at the base. The web is unstructured and a notoriously difficult corpus to work with, that&#039;s why we try to organise it using RDF and such things. 

&quot;Bringing meaning to the web&quot; through the semantic web is not the same as &quot;machine natural language understanding&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked your post (especially the pictures) but I have to say that although you are right in saying that the &#8220;semantic web&#8221; has a long way to go to be truly &#8220;semantic&#8221;, the &#8220;semantic web&#8221; != &#8220;semantics&#8221;  &#8211; it&#8217;s more of an abstraction.  When we refer to &#8220;containers&#8221; in coding, we don&#8217;t actually mean that they can hold liquid in them. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.scienceforseo.com/semantic-web/semantics-web-semantics/" rel="nofollow">http://www.scienceforseo.com/semantic-web/semantics-web-semantics/</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s natural language understanding (and generation) that has to develop for the language issue to be resolved. For that to happen AI also have to progress. Using structured data wikipedia style and querying via SPARQL is fine, it&#8217;s what Sem Web is about at the base. The web is unstructured and a notoriously difficult corpus to work with, that&#8217;s why we try to organise it using RDF and such things. </p>
<p>&#8220;Bringing meaning to the web&#8221; through the semantic web is not the same as &#8220;machine natural language understanding&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris McGiffen</title>
		<link>http://www.acquisio.com/blog/9-ways-the-internet-could-change-that-would-make-search-as-we-know-it-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-5684</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris McGiffen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 12:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquisio.com/blog/?p=685#comment-5684</guid>
		<description>Your first few points seem to say that the current search engines are already indexing and retrieving pages from the entire Internet; far from it as I&#039;m sure you know ;)

So in a way they already are specialising, with popular, linked to content that they can see, ignoring a whole heap more cr@p out there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your first few points seem to say that the current search engines are already indexing and retrieving pages from the entire Internet; far from it as I&#8217;m sure you know <img src='http://www.acquisio.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>So in a way they already are specialising, with popular, linked to content that they can see, ignoring a whole heap more cr@p out there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Patterson</title>
		<link>http://www.acquisio.com/blog/9-ways-the-internet-could-change-that-would-make-search-as-we-know-it-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-5641</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Patterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 20:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquisio.com/blog/?p=685#comment-5641</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking #9 is the most likely, LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking #9 is the most likely, LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Our Links from August 27th through August 28th &#124; Socialsquare - we make participation happen</title>
		<link>http://www.acquisio.com/blog/9-ways-the-internet-could-change-that-would-make-search-as-we-know-it-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-5626</link>
		<dc:creator>Our Links from August 27th through August 28th &#124; Socialsquare - we make participation happen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquisio.com/blog/?p=685#comment-5626</guid>
		<description>[...] Martin: Nine ways the Internet could change that would make Search as we know it Obsolete &#124; Acquisio... - At this point in history we search by guessing at words that might be in the document that we are hoping also contains the actual piece of information we&#8217;re trying to determine. When you think outside the search-box a little, this methodology doesn&#8217;t necessarily strike you as the ultimate form of human-understandable information retrieval [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Martin: Nine ways the Internet could change that would make Search as we know it Obsolete | Acquisio&#8230; &#8211; At this point in history we search by guessing at words that might be in the document that we are hoping also contains the actual piece of information we&rsquo;re trying to determine. When you think outside the search-box a little, this methodology doesn&rsquo;t necessarily strike you as the ultimate form of human-understandable information retrieval [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-08-27 - NOWUSEIT.COM</title>
		<link>http://www.acquisio.com/blog/9-ways-the-internet-could-change-that-would-make-search-as-we-know-it-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-5621</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-08-27 - NOWUSEIT.COM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acquisio.com/blog/?p=685#comment-5621</guid>
		<description>[...] Nine ways the Internet could change that would make Search as we know it Obsolete &#124; Acquisio Search ... At this point in history we search by guessing at words that might be in the document that we are hoping also contains the actual piece of information we’re trying to determine. When you think outside the search-box a little, this methodology doesn’t necessarily strike you as the ultimate form of human-understandable information retrieval (tags: search change ideas socialsquare) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nine ways the Internet could change that would make Search as we know it Obsolete | Acquisio Search &#8230; At this point in history we search by guessing at words that might be in the document that we are hoping also contains the actual piece of information we’re trying to determine. When you think outside the search-box a little, this methodology doesn’t necessarily strike you as the ultimate form of human-understandable information retrieval (tags: search change ideas socialsquare) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
